A death nobody talks about.NOTE
NOTE: I need to preface this post with a little clarity about my neighbors and me. I live in an area, large HOA, etc., that is predominantly “Dutch” Reformed Christians of all varieties. Keep in mind that the United States has dozens of Reformed Christian denominations, ranging from large Presbyterian bodies to smaller Dutch Reformed and conservative Calvinist congregations. I am within walking distance of a grade school and middle school, about 3 miles from a major Reformed high school, and walking distance to two churches and a short bike ride to three others. Most of my neighbors are members of one or more of the local churches. I am roughly 6 miles from a Reformed Seminary, which actually is located across the street from a Catholic Church I attend. This blog post reflects my conversations introducing Thomas Merton to many of my neighbors as we sit in our backyards and chat.
But first a little story:
On 10 December 1968, Thomas Merton died in Bangkok, electrocuted by a faulty fan after giving a talk on monasticism and Marxism. He was fifty-three and had been out of his Kentucky monastery for just two months.
That same day, half a world away in Basel, Karl Barth died in his sleep. Barth was eighty-two, and he was the most formidable Reformed theologian since Calvin himself.
Almost nobody remembers this coincidence. It is worth thinking about because two years earlier Merton had opened his book Conjectures of a Guilty Bystander with a short piece called “Barth’s Dream.” Barth dreamed he was examining Mozart in theology and failing him because Mozart would not answer his questions. Merton, reading this, was delighted. He suggested Mozart was the child hidden inside the great dogmatician, the part of Barth that music could reach but doctrine could not. He ended with a blessing across the confessional divide: Fear not, Karl Barth. Trust in the divine mercy.
That sums up Merton’s whole relationship with the Reformed tradition. It was not a debate, but a conversation about what a rigorous theology might be missing and what it might quietly get right.
Merton barely wrote about Calvin at all.
Let’s be honest about the evidence. Merton wrote volumes on Zen, the Desert Fathers, Eastern Orthodoxy, and Sufism. On John Calvin, he wrote almost nothing.
Anything we say here is a reconstruction, assembled from what he said about grace, the Church, the sacraments, activism, and mystery. It is an informed portrait, not a transcript. This is worth stating clearly because much writing on Merton quietly turns inference into quotation.
The simple verdict that “Merton was against Calvinism” is wrong. He respected much but also thought something important had been lost.
What he would have admired
Merton had little patience for religion as an inherited habit. He was critical of Catholics whose faith was mostly cultural furniture, a set of practices, a tribe, or a Sunday routine.
Calvin’s instincts were the opposite, and Merton would have noticed that:
- an overwhelming seriousness about God
- Scripture taken as something that reads you
- suspicion of empty religious performance
- insistence on real conversion, not social conformity
- a disciplined life as evidence of an actual one
Merton never claimed the Reformation invented its own grievances. The sixteenth-century Church had real problems, and he acknowledged that. What he thought had been lost.
Here’s the fault line.
For Merton, God is encountered through things: bread and wine, silence, liturgy, a hillside at four in the morning, the face of a stranger on a street corner in Louisville. Beauty is not decoration but a channel.
Large parts of the Reformed tradition became wary of images, symbols, mysticism, and the monastery. This was not because of philistinism but out of a real fear of idolatry and a conviction that God had chosen the Word as the way he comes to us.
Merton understood that fear but thought the cost was too high. For him, Christianity was never mainly about holding correct beliefs. It was about existing found by God in the ordinary texture of life.
Human nature: a smaller gap than usually claimed
This is where popular accounts get sloppy. Let’s be careful.
People often summarize Calvin as teaching total human depravity, and Merton as teaching that we retain the image of God. Framed this way, they seem impossible to reconcile. Calvin did not teach that the image of God is erased. He taught it is defaced, corrupted, buried under ruin — and that grace restores it. “Total” depravity, in the Reformed sense, has always meant that sin touches every part of us, not that we are as bad as we could be.
Merton, drawing on Augustine and the Greek Fathers, focused on something else. His well-known distinction between the True Self and the False Self assumes that under all the wreckage, a God-given identity remains. Grace uncovers it rather than replacing it with something foreign.
So the real difference is one of emphasis and mood, not a direct contradiction. Calvin focuses on the ruin, while Merton looks at what still stands within it. Both are describing the same building.
System versus mystic: Calvin wrote the Institutes of the Christian Religion, first published in 1536 when he was twenty-six, and expanded and revised until the final edition in 1559. It remains one of the great architectural achievements of Christian thought. Thought.
Merton respected theology. He was wary of systems.
His recurring instinct was that God is always larger than the ideas we use to understand him. This is not anti-intellectualism since Merton read widely and argued sharply. It is a claim about the purpose of theology. For Merton, doctrine points the way but does not contain God. Silence and contemplation were not just extras but part of how you come to know anything about God.
Work, activism, and the danger of never stopping
Calvinist cultures have often been energetic, strong in education, commerce, civic life, and disciplined labor.
Max Weber famously connected the Protestant ethic to the rise of modern capitalism. Historians have debated this thesis for over a century, and many think it is overstated. Consider it a provocation, not a settled fact.
Merton’s concern was not really the same as Weber’s. He believed that the modern world, both Catholic and Protestant, had turned constant activity into a form of self-justification. He thought contemplation was not a retreat from action, but the foundation that makes action honest.
Without it, he warned:
- activism curdles into ideology
- work becomes idolatry
- religion shrinks to moralism
He would have aimed that at his own Church first.
The monastery
Merton entered the Abbey of Gethsemani in 1941 and stayed for twenty-seven years. Monastic life wasn’t a preference for him; it was the shape of his existence.
Calvin, in Book IV of the Institutes, criticized monasticism. It’s worth noting a nuance that is often missed: he spoke with some respect for the earliest monks and reserved his criticism for what the medieval system had become, such as vows which bound consciences, a two-tier Christianity, and a withdrawal he saw as a flight from the ordinary callings where God actually places people.
Merton would have replied that the monastery is not a withdrawal from the Church’s mission, but one of its clearest forms. This is probably their deepest practical disagreement, and it is not one that either side could persuade the other to change.
Election and freedom
Merton rarely addressed predestination directly. But his writing consistently emphasizes human freedom, cooperation with grace, ongoing conversion, and personal response, which is closer to mainstream Catholic teaching than to unconditional election and irresistible grace.
He mostly didn’t argue the point. He just wrote as though the question had a different center of gravity.
What ecumenism actually changed
People often say that Vatican II turned Merton toward other Christians. That’s mostly true, but the timeline is less clear than it seems. Merton was corresponding with Protestants well before the Council opened in 1962, and he died in 1968, only three years after it closed. The Council confirmed and encouraged an openness he already had; it did not create it.
There may also be something more ancient at work. Merton’s mother came from a Quaker background, and as a young man he attended Quaker meetings and found little genuine interest. Such silence he later found in a Trappist monastery had a Protestant precedent in his own childhood.
What changed over his life was the question he brought to other traditions. He became less focused on asking why they were wrong, and more interested in what the Holy Spirit had preserved in them.
Where he’d find friends today
Merton would recognize much in contemporary Reformed Christians who are committed to serious biblical study, racial reconciliation, peacemaking, intellectual honesty, and humble discipleship. He tended to look for common ground first, without pretending that real differences had disappeared.
The comparison, briefly
Center of gravity
God’s sovereignty; union with God through contemplation
Human nature
Image of God defaced by sin, restored by grace. Image of God buried but intact, uncovered by grace.
Theology
Systematic, doctrinal, mystical, contemplative
Worship
Word, preaching, simplicity; Sacramental, liturgical, silent
Monasticism
Rejected as an institution; a central Christian vocation
Church
Visible Church reformed and ordered by Scripture; Catholic Church enriched by ecumenical exchange.
Christian life
Faith worked out in disciplined obedience and vocation. Interior transformation expressed in love and action.
Mystery
Clarity where Scripture speaks, silence where it doesn’t. Mystery and silence as permanent companions to doctrine
Back to Merton’s most interesting Protestant conversations were not with Calvin. They were with people who came after him and recovered the contemplative and prophetic spirit of the tradition, such as Barth, with his Christ-centered vision, and Dietrich Bonhoeffer, with his costly discipleship. (Bonhoeffer was Lutheran rather than Reformed, a distinction often overlooked by my neighbors, but important.) Bonhoeffer especially brought together what Merton valued most: deep prayer, resistance to nationalism, hunger for justice, and contemplation that led to action rather than replacing it.
This brings us back to Barth failing Mozart in a dream, and to two men dying on the same December day in 1968: one in a hotel room in Bangkok, the other in his bed in Basel.
Merton’s instinct was never to win the argument. Instead, he wanted to ask what the other tradition had been keeping safe for him. That is a harder discipline than disagreement, and a more useful one.
Discover more from Innovate ~ Educate ~ Collaborate
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Leave a Reply